Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl Actually Fights Interest in Bowl Games

The Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl is hosted in the beautiful AT&T Park in San Francisco, home to the San Francisco Giants and featuring scenic views of the San Francisco bay.  It’s been played there since 2002 and has previously been named the Emerald Bowl, San Francisco Bowl, and the Diamond Walnut San Francisco Bowl.

Last year’s matchup featuring a 13-1 Nevada Wolfpack team, fresh off an upset of previously undefeated Boise State and ranked 13th in the season ending poll against a 7-5 Boston College team.  The University of Nevada is 4 hours from San Francisco, and thus, it’s not overly surprising that they managed to sell not just their 11,000 ticket allotment but an additional 4,369 tickets on top of those and were told they would receive no more tickets.  Boston College was actually pleading fans to buy their tickets so they could give them for free to local charities.   Yikes.  Regardless, the game had 41,063 people in attendance.

Fast forward to this year where the bowl featured a matchup between 6-6 Illinois that hadn’t won in 12 weeks and had fired their coach at midseason and 6-7 UCLA (6 hour drive) that was fresh off a stomping at USC and a blowout against Oregon in the Pac 12 championship.  Not only that, UCLA had to plead the NCAA for a special exemption to even get into the bowl game.  As of Dec 30th, the day before the game, Illinois had moved under 2,000 of their 8,000 ticket allotment, and UCLA wasn’t making these figures available.  It’s fair to assume that UCLA’s were going better, but still not well.  Maybe after having to beg to get in, they didn’t want to admit they couldn’t find paydirt.

Attendance at the game clocked in at 29,878, a drop of 11,185 from the previous year.  That’s a 27% drop, but who’s counting?

The Fight Hunger Bowl wasn’t even the worst stink bomb of this bowl season.

The Poinsettia Bowl is hosted in beautiful San Diego, California.  Last year, a matchup between San Diego State, a solid team that defines “local”, and Navy in a strong Navy city drew over 48,000.  This year, a matchup between two teams from halfway across the country, Louisiana Tech and a slightly down TCU, drew 24,600.  For those doing their math at home, that’s an astounding nearly 50% drop.

So what’s going on here?

  1. Matchups matter.  Throwing together any old teams and charging whatever you feel like for tickets won’t necessarily attract crowds, especially when all the games are live on ESPN in HD.
  2. More people may be electing to stay at home and watch on TV.  Nothing gets better coverage on TV than the college football bowl season.  Let’s say you’re a TCU fan considering a trip to San Diego.  If you’re not excited about this matchup, wouldn’t you strongly consider just staying in Texas and watching on TV with some fellow alums?
  3. Travel and a down economy are a rough mix.  People can seem to stomach a short drive to see their favorite team, but when you’re asking them to fly across the country to play in a game that’s supposed to be an “honor” against a mostly invisible Louisiana Tech team or, frankly, an embarrassing UCLA team, fans just aren’t going to make the trip.
We discussed on the show my complete confusion with UCLA’s interest in playing in this bowl game at all.  If I were to get into their head, the most likely logic is that they thought they didn’t “belong” in that Pac 12 championship game, since that should have been USC’s spot, and thus they could pretend, and were allowed to pretend like that loss didn’t matter.
But for their efforts, they sustained a loss to a pitiful Illinois team, likely lost money on the experience, and in all likelihood, inspired exactly no one to consider attending UCLA.  Except for maybe Jim Mora Jr.  But let’s be honest, he’s just hoping to get an NFL gig again and would have accepted the job at TC Williams High School if Denzel Washington didn’t have that job already.  He’s still looking at the Miami Sharks position, if Al Pacino decides to quit due to old age.  Maybe he can be coach in waiting.
So, if you lose money, attendance stinks, you lose to a garbage team, and you get rewarded with a coach you hired before the game, why on Earth did UCLA want to attend this bowl game?  The justification given was that it was for the seniors.  Any time that a decision is made in college football and the justification is given that it’s “for the players”, I call shenanigans.  Especially considering the school later decided to withhold the players checks that they were supposed to get to help support themselves during the time the school was shut down and the players were still in town practicing for the bowl game.
Since the school’s explanation doesn’t hold up, we get to make up our own explanation.  I think this is what’s going on at UCLA:
The athletic department wanted to avoid a 2 year bowl drought, which would have been the first two year bowl drought at UCLA since 1997.  In fact, they’ve only missed 3 bowls since 1997.  Since Athletic Director Dan Guerrero started at UCLA in 2002, the man who said this was for the seniors, the Bruins have missed two bowl games.  Missing in 2008 and 2010 with 4-8 records, Dan had to take the opportunity to sneak into the bowl game this year.  With a new hire coming in mid December and a bowl appearance, albeit a shoddy one, Dan can sell that the program is going in a positive direction.  Don’t forget that the previously dominant basketball program has also been decidedly average the past few seasons.
Dan’s necessary paranoia over his job, combined with the demands of boosters on the program, people’s irrational understanding of the roots of college football, and a total lack of perspective as long as it’s passed off as “student athletes” create conditions where schools lose boatloads of money on bowl games that fan bases don’t care about.
So, I wonder when a school is going to turn down an invite to a bowl game and decide to stay home.  I don’t think the conditions exist for them to do so.  Fans are too crazy and too irrational, and the idea that going to a bowl, albeit a crappy one that the fans aren’t interested in, is perceived as success only serve to perpetuate a broken system.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers